Ogbomoso Ranks 964th in Oxford Global Cities Index: A Wake-Up Call for Development, Not a Verdict on the Throne
Ogbomoso Ranks 964th in Oxford Global Cities Index: A Wake-Up Call for Development, Not a Verdict on the Throne
By Akin Alade
Ogbomoso’s position in the 2026 Oxford Economics Global Cities Index should serve as a fresh opportunity to rethink the city’s economic future, investment potential and urban development priorities, rather than become a subject of unnecessary political controversy or criticism of its traditional institution.
The city, identified as Ogbomosho in the index, ranks 964th among 1,000 cities assessed worldwide, with an overall score of approximately 13.2. It occupies the ninth position among the 18 Nigerian cities included in the ranking, according to Oxford Economics’ published comparison tool. The results place Ogbomoso behind Ibadan, which ranks 881st globally, and Port Harcourt, which is positioned at 956th.
The index evaluates cities across five major areas: economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. These indicators are designed to provide a broader picture of urban performance, including economic strength, labour-force capacity, living conditions, environmental sustainability and institutional effectiveness. The methodology therefore goes beyond population size, historical significance or cultural influence.
For Ogbomoso, the more important question is not simply why the city occupies the 964th position, but what public institutions, business leaders, investors, professionals and community stakeholders can do to improve its future standing. The ranking presents an opportunity to identify development gaps and build a practical strategy for transforming the city into a stronger economic and commercial centre.
Historically recognised for its educational institutions, commercial activities, agricultural connections and rich Yoruba cultural heritage, Ogbomoso has assets that could support a more ambitious development agenda. However, these advantages must be translated into measurable outcomes, including productive employment, stronger local businesses, improved infrastructure, better environmental management and expanded opportunities for young people.
The comparison with Ibadan is particularly instructive. With an 83-place difference in the global ranking, the two cities offer an opportunity for policymakers and business leaders to examine differences in economic structure, human capital, quality of life and other measured indicators. Such a comparison should encourage evidence-based planning rather than unhealthy rivalry between neighbouring urban centres.
Ogbomoso’s position also highlights the need for stronger collaboration between government, the private sector, educational institutions, professional associations and the traditional institution. Sustainable urban development requires more than the activities of any single officeholder or institution; it depends on coordinated policies, investment, infrastructure delivery and effective implementation over time.
The traditional institution can contribute meaningfully to this process by promoting peace, encouraging investment, supporting community development initiatives and bringing stakeholders together around shared priorities. However, the global index should not be interpreted as a direct assessment of the performance of the reigning monarch. Its overall ranking covers multiple urban indicators and, in the governance category, includes national-level measures. It is therefore not a personal performance score for an individual traditional ruler.
Against this background, His Imperial Majesty, Oba Ghadi Orumogege, and other community stakeholders can be part of a broader conversation about the future of Ogbomoso. Respect for the throne and commitment to the city’s development are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, constructive engagement between traditional leadership, government and the business community can help build the consensus needed to pursue lasting progress.
The next step should be to move beyond the ranking itself and develop a clear development agenda. Priorities could include attracting new businesses, strengthening existing markets, supporting small and medium-sized enterprises, improving road networks and drainage, expanding vocational training, creating opportunities for graduates and encouraging investment in technology and agro-processing.
Ogbomoso’s sons and daughters at home and in the diaspora also have an important role to play. Through investment partnerships, mentorship, skills transfer and support for local enterprises, they can help create opportunities that benefit residents and strengthen the city’s economic base. Such efforts would be more meaningful if supported by transparent targets and regular assessments of progress.
It is equally important to understand that a global ranking is a comparative benchmark, not a permanent verdict on a city’s prospects. Oxford Economics describes its Global Cities Index as a tool for comparing urban economies and identifying strengths, weaknesses and opportunities. Cities can improve their position when economic conditions, human capital, environmental performance and other relevant indicators improve.
Ultimately, Ogbomoso should use the 2026 ranking as a call to action. Its historical importance and cultural heritage remain valuable, but the next chapter of its story must also be defined by investment, innovation, jobs, infrastructure and improved living standards.
The challenge before the city is to turn its existing strengths into measurable development outcomes. With sustained collaboration, strategic investment and accountable implementation, Ogbomoso can work towards a stronger position in future assessments while improving the everyday lives of its residents.
Long live Ogbomoso. Long live its traditional institution. May the city continue to grow in peace, prosperity and development.
