SERAP Condemns Sowore Bail Revocation, Raises Concerns Over Human Rights and Free Speech

SERAP Condemns Sowore Bail Revocation, Raises Concerns Over Human Rights and Free Speech
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has strongly criticized the reported revocation of the bail granted to activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore, describing the action as a threat to fundamental human rights and democratic freedoms in Nigeria.
In a statement, the rights advocacy organization expressed concern over the Federal High Court’s decision to revoke Sowore’s bail and issue a bench warrant for his arrest in connection with an ongoing cybercrime and defamation case. SERAP argued that the development reflects a disturbing pattern of alleged harassment and reprisals against critics of government policies and public officials.
According to the organization, the legal actions against Sowore risk undermining freedom of expression, civic engagement, and public participation in governance. SERAP maintained that criticism of public officials and government policies remains a constitutional right that should not attract punitive legal measures.
The group further warned that the use of judicial processes to target journalists, activists, and civil society actors could create a climate of fear and self-censorship, weakening democratic institutions and public accountability. It stressed that public office holders in democratic societies are expected to tolerate greater scrutiny from citizens and the media.
SERAP also raised concerns about due process and the protection of individual liberties, insisting that restrictions on freedom should only occur under exceptional circumstances and in line with constitutional provisions. The organization argued that pretrial measures should not be deployed as instruments of punishment before a court reaches a final determination.
Calling for immediate action, SERAP urged Nigerian authorities to reverse the bail revocation, withdraw what it described as unjust legal actions against Sowore, and guarantee his right to continue his journalism and human rights advocacy without intimidation or harassment. The group also advocated reforms aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s bail system and safeguarding citizens against arbitrary detention.
The controversy surrounding Sowore’s case has continued to attract attention from civil society organizations and rights groups, many of whom view the matter as a critical test of Nigeria’s commitment to the rule of law, judicial independence, and protection of civil liberties.


