Declared their removal as null and void, ordered full payment of their entitlements and allowances.
An Ogun State High Court sitting in Abeokuta has affirmed the promotion of the 75 village heads to coronet Obas by the immediate past Governor, Ibikunle Amosun.
The former Governor had upgraded the 75 village heads to Coronet Obas nine days to the expiration of his administration .
But on assumption of duty, Governor Dapo Abiodun set up a committee, which reviewed and recommended that the promotion of the traditional rulers from Baale to Oba be reversed.
In February, Governor Dapo Abiodun announced the demotion of the Obas, as recommended by the committee chaired by the Olu ilaro and paramount ruler of Yewaland, Oba Kehinde Olugbenle.
Not satisfied with the recommendation of the committee set up by the state government, the 75 Obas dragged the governor and other officials of the state government to court, asking for their reinstatement and payment of their entitlements.
The coronet Obas also got a interlocutory injunction that maintained their appointment as coronet Obas till the Court said otherwise.
The Presiding Judge, Justice Abiodun Akinyemi, in his judgement declared the removal of the Obas, null and void.
Akinyemi also granted the Obas a perpetual injunction, barring the defendants, the Ogun State Governor, State Commissioner for Local government and Cheiftancy Affairs, the Permanent Secretary of the State Ministry of Local government and Cheiftaincy Affairs or its agents from removing them from office except in fulfilment of the law.
He also ordered that the claimants (the coronet Obas) be paid all renumeration attached to their offices from the date of their installation up till the moment of the judgement.
The Judge also ruled that the Obas were not given a fair hearing by the review committee set up by the State Governor, faulting the process.
On the argument raised by the defending counsel that the then Executive Council was misled before the appointment of the Oba, Justice Akinyemi ruled that there is know evidence of misleading in the evidence presented by the defence counsel and that if there was ever a misleading evidence ,it didn’t come from the claimants.
He said the misleading evidence came from the State Ministry of local government and Chieftaincy affairs represented by the then Commissioner in the Ministry as a member of the then State Executive Council
